In his bid for the House speakership, Rep. Jim Jordan is facing resistance from approximately 55 of his colleagues who have declared that they will not vote for him. However, Jordan and his allies have found a new argument to try and win over these holdouts: the ongoing war in Israel. They are emphasizing the need to stand with Israel and urging their colleagues to set aside their objections and support Jordan’s bid for speaker. Additionally, this tactic is being reinforced by a promotional video featuring Jordan’s recent comments on Israel, as well as Fox News host Sean Hannity using the war in Israel as a reason for House GOP holdouts to resume work. While there is an irony to this approach, given that Jordan and his allies previously didn’t raise concerns about the lack of a speaker during the war in Israel, their argument seems to be making some headway, as evidenced by Rep. Mike Rogers’ announcement that he now supports Jordan’s bid.
Table of Contents
Overview
In the race for the House Speakership, Rep. Jim Jordan is facing significant challenges as approximately 55 of his colleagues have expressed opposition to his candidacy. However, Jordan and his allies have employed a new argument to try to win over his hold-out colleagues – support for Israel amidst the ongoing war. This article will examine Jordan’s bid for Speaker and how his position on Israel is being used as a persuasive tool. It will also explore the promotion video highlighting Jordan’s stance on Israel and the coverage of this topic by Fox News. Additionally, there will be an analysis of the irony in Jordan’s argument, considering his previous holdout against House Majority Leader Steve Scalise. The article will also discuss the expected approval of aid to Israel by Congress and the presence of anti-Jordan holdouts, particularly defense hawks. Finally, the announcement of Rep. Mike Rogers to support Jordan will be examined, followed by a conclusion summarizing the main points of the article with final thoughts on Jordan’s bid for House Speakership based on support for Israel.
Background
Jim Jordan, the Republican nominee for Speaker, is facing resistance from approximately 55 of his colleagues who have indicated that they will not vote for him. As the Judiciary Committee Chairman and a strong ally of former President Donald Trump, Jordan’s bid for Speaker has encountered obstacles. The significant number of hold-out colleagues presents a challenging situation for Jordan as he seeks to secure the necessary support.
Jim Jordan’s Struggle for Speaker Support
In a closed-door meeting last week, 55 colleagues made it clear that they would not vote for Jim Jordan, even on the House floor. This opposition has posed a significant challenge for Jordan’s speakership bid. To overcome this struggle, Jordan must find a way to win over his colleagues who have expressed objections to his candidacy. The following sections will explore one of the arguments being used to persuade his hold-out colleagues – support for Israel amid the ongoing war.
Using the War in Israel as an Argument
Jim Jordan and his allies have turned to the war in Israel as a persuasive tool to convince their hold-out colleagues to set their objections aside and support Jordan’s speakership bid. By emphasizing the need to stand with Israel during this critical time, Jordan hopes to rally support and overcome the opposition he is facing. The appeal to the shared concern for Israel’s security and stability serves as a means to encourage colleagues to prioritize unity and back Jordan as Speaker.
Promotion Video and Fox News Coverage
To further bolster his position, a promotion video highlighting Jim Jordan’s stance on Israel has been released by two of his allies, Reps. Chip Roy and Anna Paulina Luna. The video prominently features Jordan’s recent comments on Israel, with the intention of bolstering his appeal among colleagues who prioritize strong support for Israel. In addition, Fox News host Sean Hannity has also used the war in Israel as a talking point, further amplifying the argument being made in favor of Jordan’s speakership bid.
Irony in Jordan’s Argument
While Jim Jordan and his allies are now emphasizing the importance of standing with Israel, there is an irony to this argument. During their own holdout against House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Jordan and his allies did not express concern about the lack of a Speaker amidst the ongoing war in Israel. This inconsistency has raised eyebrows and sparked anger among House Republicans who feel that Jordan and his allies are being hypocritical in their prioritization of Israel as a persuasive tool.
Congress Expected to Approve Aid to Israel
In the aftermath of the Hamas attacks, Congress is expected to approve some form of aid to Israel. While the White House has yet to make a formal request, the circumstances surrounding the war have heightened the urgency and importance of providing support to Israel. This anticipated approval of aid underscores the significance of the situation and adds weight to the argument being made by Jordan and his allies.
Anti-Jordan Holdouts and Defense Hawks
Among the hold-out colleagues opposing Jim Jordan’s bid for Speaker, there are defense hawks who may take issue with Jordan’s stance on Ukraine. One example is Rep. Mike Rogers, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and a strong supporter of providing aid to Ukraine. Unlike Jordan, Rogers has expressed openness to working with Democrats to elect a Speaker rather than voting for the Ohio Republican. This dynamic highlights the complexity of securing support for Jordan’s speakership bid.
Rogers’ Announcement to Support Jordan
In an unexpected turn of events, Rep. Mike Rogers announced on Monday morning that he would support Jim Jordan after all. This endorsement from Rogers, who had previously indicated potential opposition to Jordan, represents a significant development in Jordan’s quest for Speaker. It remains to be seen how this will impact the overall support for Jordan and whether it will sway any of the hold-out colleagues to reevaluate their stance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Jim Jordan’s bid for the House Speakership has encountered resistance from a sizable number of colleagues. However, Jordan and his allies have employed the war in Israel as an argument to convince their hold-out colleagues to support Jordan. The promotion video and Fox News coverage have further emphasized Jordan’s stance on Israel. Nevertheless, there is irony in Jordan’s argument, given his previous holdout against Steve Scalise. Congress is expected to approve aid to Israel, and the presence of anti-Jordan holdouts, such as defense hawks, adds complexity to the situation. The announcement of Rep. Mike Rogers to support Jordan represents a significant development. As the race for the Speakership continues, the outcome will depend on the ability of Jordan to secure the necessary support from his hold-out colleagues, taking into account their concerns and priorities.