Law Students from Harvard and Columbia Lose Job Offers Over Statements on Israel-Hamas War

Three law students from Harvard and Columbia University have lost their job offers from law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell due to their involvement in student organizations that made statements regarding the Israel-Hamas war that conflicted with the firm’s values. Davis Polk confirmed that the students had their job offers revoked, stating that the views expressed in the statements were contrary to the firm’s value system. This incident comes in the wake of a similar situation where an NYU law student also had a job offer rescinded over a statement on Israel. Tensions surrounding the conflict have permeated college campuses, with student organizations taking sides and issuing statements. CEOs and investors have also demanded that Harvard release the names of students involved in the groups that blamed Israel for the Hamas attacks. The consequences of these statements go beyond just students, as tech leaders have pulled out of a major industry conference in Europe after the CEO of the summit criticized Israel.

Job Offers Rescinded

Davis Polk pulls job offers from law students

Davis Polk & Wardwell, a prominent law firm, has pulled job offers from three law students, two from Harvard University and one from Columbia University. The students’ job offers were revoked due to their involvement in student organizations that made statements on the Israel-Hamas war, which were deemed to be against the values of the law firm.

NYU law student also had job offer revoked

In addition to the three students from Harvard and Columbia, a law student from New York University (NYU) also had their job offer rescinded over a statement they made about the Hamas attacks on Israel. This trend of job offers being withdrawn from students who expressed their views on the conflict highlights the sensitivity of the issue and the potential consequences for individuals who take a position that goes against the prevailing opinions.

Reasons for Rescission

Statements on Israel-Hamas war went against firm’s values

The reason for Davis Polk’s decision to revoke the job offers was the students’ involvement in student organizations that made statements regarding the Israel-Hamas war. These statements were found to be in direct opposition to the values upheld by Davis Polk & Wardwell. The firm’s spokesperson stated that the views expressed in certain statements signed by the law school student organizations were in “direct contravention” of the firm’s value system, which led to the withdrawal of the job offers.

Davis Polk’s Statement

Views expressed in statements contravene firm’s value system

Davis Polk & Wardwell, in response to the controversy, released a statement explaining their decision to rescind the job offers. The statement emphasized that the views expressed in the statements signed by the student organizations were contrary to the firm’s value system. It is clear that Davis Polk takes its values and the maintenance of a supportive and inclusive work environment seriously.

Firm wants to maintain a supportive and inclusive work environment

The law firm expressed its commitment to maintaining a supportive and inclusive work environment. To ensure the continuation of such an environment, Davis Polk decided that the student leaders responsible for signing the statements on the Israel-Hamas war were no longer welcome in the firm. Consequently, their job offers were rescinded. This decision underscores the importance Davis Polk places on promoting a workplace culture that aligns with its values.

Email by Davis Polk Chair

Neil Barr’s email reveals students’ leadership positions in organizations

Neil Barr, the chair of Davis Polk & Wardwell, sent an email to the rest of the firm explaining the reasons behind the withdrawal of the job offers. The email also revealed that the affected students held leadership positions in the student organizations that issued the statements on the Israel-Hamas war. This additional information sheds light on the significance of the students’ involvement in the organizations and the weight given to their statements.

Tensions on College Campuses

College campuses experience high tensions due to the war

Tensions have been running high on college campuses in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war. The conflict, which began with a series of terror attacks by Hamas on October 7, has led to an escalation of violence between Israel and Palestine. College campuses, known as spaces for robust intellectual exchange and diverse opinions, have been impacted by the fervor surrounding the conflict.

Student groups issue statements after initial attacks

Following the initial attacks, numerous student organizations at various universities issued statements expressing their positions on the Israel-Hamas war. These statements served as expressions of solidarity with the affected parties and attempts to engage in the broader discourse surrounding the conflict. The reactions from student groups revealed the differing perspectives and opinions on the matter.

Statements from Harvard Student Organizations

Student organizations at Harvard blame Israel entirely for violence

Certain student organizations at Harvard University released a statement in response to the Israel-Hamas war, placing the blame solely on Israel for the violence. The statement held Israel “entirely responsible” for all the acts of violence that had occurred. This position represents a specific point of view that highlights the need for dialogue and debate surrounding complex geopolitical issues.

Statements from Columbia Student Organizations

Some Columbia students describe Hamas attacks as a counter-offensive

In contrast to the position taken by certain student organizations at Harvard, some Columbia University students described the Hamas attacks on Israel as a counter-offensive against their perceived oppressor. This perspective frames the attacks as a response to the ongoing “settler-colonial” dynamic. The differing viewpoints on college campuses are indicative of the broader debates taking place within society.

Winston & Strawn’s Job Offer Rescission

Job offer withdrawn from NYU law student over statement on Hamas attacks

Winston & Strawn, another law firm, rescinded a job offer to a law student from New York University (NYU). The withdrawal of the job offer was a direct result of the student’s statement on the Hamas attacks on Israel. The statement attributed full responsibility for the loss of life to Israel. This incident further highlights the consequences that individuals face for expressing their views on the Israel-Hamas war.

Call for Disclosure of Student Names

CEOs and investors demand Harvard release names of students in groups blaming Israel

CEOs and investors have called for transparency regarding the names of the students affiliated with the organizations at Harvard that issued statements blaming Israel for the Hamas attacks. This demand underscores the significance of individual accountability and the potential ramifications for those who express controversial opinions. The call for disclosure raises important questions about the balance between freedom of expression and professional consequences.

Consequences for Statements on the War

Tech leaders withdraw from top industry conference after CEO criticizes Israel

The consequences for individuals’ statements about the Israel-Hamas war are not confined to the academic sphere. Several tech leaders decided to withdraw from a prominent industry conference in Europe after the CEO of the conference criticized Israel. This development shows how opinions and expressions of support or criticism can have far-reaching effects beyond the initial context in which they are made.

Students and tech leaders face consequences for their statements

The withdrawal of job offers and the decision of tech leaders to refrain from participating in conferences indicate that individuals from various sectors face consequences for their statements on the Israel-Hamas war. The controversy surrounding the conflict highlights the potential impact of expressing controversial viewpoints in professional and public arenas. The repercussions serve as a reminder of the importance of thoughtful communication and understanding diverse perspectives in complex geopolitical contexts.

Scroll to Top